Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malacca Art Gallery

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) JAaron95 ^Talk 14:03, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Malacca Art Gallery

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG. Another tiny museum with only primary sources. Malay version of this article is Unreferenced LibStar (talk) 16:38, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:44, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:44, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:44, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:44, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Malacca is a historic place with lots of museums. These are notable, being documented in detail in sources such as Melaka History and Heritage in Museums. There may be some scope for merger, especially for those which are housed in the same building complex but, per our policies WP:ATD and WP:PRESERVE, this would not be done by deletion. Andrew D. (talk) 10:35, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

you've recycled this same argument in various afds but fail to show in-depth coverage about this specific museum. WP:PRESERVE does not override if an article is not notable. LibStar (talk) 11:41, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

the book reference you've supplied doesn't even appear to even mention this art gallery , that's what happens when you recycle the same AfD argument over and over again. LibStar (talk) 15:36, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Definition of "tiny" is relative. This is the only art gallery in Malacca, thus this is the most important/famous art gallery in this state. There are 7 references for the English article (not only the primary source). The Malay version of the article has 5 references now. Chongkian (talk) 06:48, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Discussed in the book Building Cultural Nationalism in Malaysia: Identity, Representation, and Citizenship, and combined with the article "Melaka hargai seni lukis", this topic meets WP:GNG. Altamel (talk) 22:37, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.